|  
      
     | 
      | 
     
      
         
            | 
            | 
         
         
          |  
             A 
              young craftsman (drawn to a much larger scale than the other figures) 
              leaves his native town in order to achieve his skills as a journeyman 
              by a Tour of France. Pen drawing with watercolor. around 1840. 
           | 
            | 
         
       
      In every instance 
      where (an) article is made in the home, the relationship between the master 
      who possesses the technical skill and the apprentice to whom it is imparted 
      is a complex one. They may be related by bloodfather-son, mother-daughter, 
      oldest son-youngest son- or by position in the household -master-servant, 
      old retainer-master's son, etc. -with all of the dissymmetry implicit in 
      the latter. The transfer of skills is never haphazard; the network it follows 
      has a sequential structure. Hence it is by no means accidental or owing 
      to some mysterious inertia that works produced in the home perpetuate ancient 
      techniques and skills long forgotten elsewhere, but, rather, because of 
      the structure of domestic relationships. To be sure, the conditions of home 
      production are not such that each unit functions as a Leibinitzean monad, 
      a closed world, a microcosm within the macrocosm. The group of people engaged 
      in the production of an article may-especially in winter-include friends 
      and neighbors. In this case, skills can be exchanged within a structure 
      of symmetrical relationships. Young men leave home, either for military 
      service or to serve their apprenticeship, and come back with new skills 
      to teach their relatives- skills developed in other places and according 
      to other norms. But techniques learned in the army or in a workshop or factory 
      are generally different in kind and cannot be passed on for home production 
      without considerable modification. The regimental forge or the saddlery 
      of a cavalry squadron do not provide viable models. The more specialized 
      the methods of production these young men are exposed to, the less easily 
      they can be adapted to the home. Hence the conditions that preserve skills 
      unchanged are the same ones that prevent the learning of new skills from 
      the outside world. Everything conspires to make home production a conservatory 
      of skills and customs.   
        
     |